Saturday, October 22, 2011

Paranormal Activity 3 'manages to scare

Film: "Paranormal Activity 3" Cast: Christopher Nicholas Smith, Katie Featherston, Csengery Chloe, Jessica Tyler Brown, Director: Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman, Rating: ****

"Paranormal Activity 3" is an amazing film. Yes, horror films are expected to crash. However, the beauty of this film lies in managing to give you the creeps even after having seen the first two. You realize there's not much new added to it. That it does so without being bold or over the top is its greatest strength.

After hearing strange sounds in their new home, a wedding videographer in 1988 decided to match the house with cameras to record these paranormal activities. Her young stepdaughter, yet it seems that he became friends with the paranormal entity even though the unbelieving wife, despite the evidence, refuses to believe, that is until something scares your skin.

You have seen the first two and who knows how the story goes and what happens. That are supposedly immune to the chills and fears and you know how and where it comes. What will surprise you, therefore, is how this film, despite his self-assurance, he manages to sneak up and terrorize you.

Like the first two, it does not aspire to explain anything to the audience. Nor is the largest sound or visual tricks. Instead, the formula is based on proven and tricks from the first two films, and manages to scare himself in a surreal way.

Charlie Chaplin is, without doubt, the best filmmaker ever, and perhaps will remain so until the death of cinema. The reason for this is that his films understand the importance of the purity of the film to squeeze the emotion of his audience. Chaplin did with the genre of comedy, "Paranormal Activity" is the series of horror.

However, it was by no means the first to do so. How can anyone forget the game-changing - "The Blair Witch Project". However, the difference between the two films in this series, and three of "Paranormal" is that while the former tried to do something different in the sequel, the latter flatly refuses to do so.

In performing the same tricks he played in the first, and so little explanation, or even less, who teaches one of the greatest lessons of cinema - that simplicity and minimalism support a good argument can often do more than expensive visual effects and a complex plot line.

No comments:

Post a Comment